Last reviewed: Next review due:
Why procurement and spending data matters for journalists
Public bodies spend hundreds of billions of pounds each year on goods, services, and contracts. That spending — and the procurement decisions that drive it — is one of the most important areas of public accountability. Stories about councils awarding contracts to politically connected companies, NHS trusts overpaying for consumables, or government departments using emergency procurement procedures to bypass competition rules are all grounded in spending and procurement data.
The good news for journalists is that a substantial amount of this data is now mandated for proactive publication. The Local Government Transparency Code 2015 requires English councils to publish monthly transaction data for all spending over £500, all contracts above £5,000, senior pay data, and asset registers. The Procurement Act 2023 (replacing the Public Contracts Regulations 2015) strengthened transparency obligations further. Many stories can be built without filing a single FOI.
Where proactive publication is incomplete, out of date, or does not drill into the detail you need, FOI requests fill the gap. The key is to request specific data in an analysable format — spreadsheets rather than PDFs, precise date ranges, and named suppliers or cost centres.
When procurement FOI requests are most valuable
- 1You want to know which suppliers have received the most money from a public body over a given period.
- 2You are investigating whether a single supplier is receiving an unusual proportion of contracts without open competition.
- 3You want the full text of a contract, including performance clauses, penalties, and exit provisions.
- 4You are looking at emergency or direct-award procurement where normal competition was bypassed.
- 5You want to cross-reference supplier payments with Companies House to check for conflicts of interest.
- 6The proactively published spending data is incomplete, out of date, or not machine-readable.
- 7You want to compare procurement in two different financial years to identify significant changes.
Red flags in procurement stories
- A contract was awarded without a competitive tender process to a recently incorporated company.
- The winning supplier has directors who are connected to officers or elected members at the awarding authority.
- The contract value is just below a threshold that would trigger wider publication or scrutiny.
- An emergency procurement procedure was used without an obvious emergency being cited.
- A framework contract has been extended repeatedly beyond its original term without retendering.
- The public body's own internal audit reports flag concerns about procurement compliance.
- A contract was modified significantly after award — effectively giving the incumbent a different contract.
Procurement FOI request checklist
- I have checked the authority's open data pages for proactively published spending data before filing.
- I have searched Find a Tender (findatender.service.gov.uk) for contract award notices.
- I have searched Contracts Finder for central government contracts.
- My request specifies the format I want (e.g., CSV or Excel spreadsheet) not just "data".
- My request specifies a precise date range rather than an open-ended period that could trigger cost ceiling arguments.
- My request identifies the supplier, cost centre, or contract type I am interested in, to narrow scope.
- I have considered which exemptions are likely to be claimed and prepared counter-arguments.
- I have noted the 20 working day response deadline and set a calendar reminder.
- If the authority claims s.43 commercial interests, I have checked whether the contract has ended (weakening the exemption).
- I have cross-referenced the supplier name against Companies House for directors, PSC, and filing history.
Copy-paste request template: spending data
FOI Builder tool
Use our FOI Builder to generate a tailored procurement or spending request for your specific authority and topic.
Open FOI BuilderTypical exemptions and how to challenge them
s.43 Commercial Interests
Qualified exemption. The authority must demonstrate that disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice commercial interests. For completed contracts, this is much harder to establish. Challenge: point out the contract has ended; note that the existence, value, and supplier are already published on Find a Tender; ask the authority to identify which specific pricing or commercial element would be prejudiced and how.
s.40 Personal Data
Absolute exemption for personal data where disclosure would breach data protection law. Commonly claimed to withhold the names of individual officers who sign off payments. Challenge: ask for payment data anonymised to cost-centre level (no individual names needed); note that senior officers' roles and responsibilities are often public via organograms; request redacted versions of contracts with personal data removed.
s.36 Prejudice to Effective Conduct of Public Affairs
Qualified exemption requiring a "reasonable opinion" from a qualified person. Sometimes claimed for information about ongoing procurement exercises. Challenge: ask for information relating to completed exercises only; request the qualified person's opinion in writing; request an internal review.
Cost ceiling (s.12)
Not an exemption but an exclusion: if complying would exceed £450 (central government) or £600 (other authorities) estimated cost, the authority can decline. Challenge by narrowing the date range, specifying a particular supplier, or splitting the request. Ask the authority what it can provide within the limit.
Common mistakes
- Requesting "all spending" with no date range or supplier filter — this will almost always be refused on cost grounds.
- Accepting a PDF dump when you requested a spreadsheet — push back; machine-readable format is a legitimate request.
- Ignoring the proactively published data on the council's open data pages — always check first.
- Not cross-referencing Find a Tender before the FOI — you may already have the contract award notice you need.
- Assuming s.43 is an absolute exemption — it is qualified, and the public interest test almost always favours disclosure for completed public contracts.
- Failing to request an internal review when you receive a refusal — you must exhaust internal review before complaining to the ICO.
- Not tracking the response deadline — 20 working days is strict; a missed deadline is itself a ground for ICO complaint.