Skip to main content

How to Pitch Editors in the UK

Research first. Lead with the story, not yourself. Keep it to three paragraphs. Know the ethics of multi-pitching. The fundamentals of a successful pitch are the same whether you are targeting a regional daily or a national Sunday.

Last reviewed: Next review due:

What makes a successful pitch

A pitch is a commission application. Its job is to convince an editor that a specific story is worth commissioning from you, for this publication, right now. Every word should serve that purpose. Editors receive hundreds of pitches a week; the ones that succeed answer three questions in the first paragraph: What is the story? Why does it matter to this publication’s readers? Why is today the right time to publish it?

Research before you write. Read the last three issues of the publication. Understand what sections exist, what angle they favour, and who the commissioning editor for your section actually is. A pitch that demonstrates real knowledge of the publication converts at a far higher rate than a generic approach. Check the masthead, LinkedIn, and the publication’s website for the right contact.

The three-paragraph structure is a proven framework, not a rigid rule. Paragraph one is the hook — the news peg, the surprising angle, or the compelling human detail that makes an editor lean forward. Paragraph two is the substance — what you know, who you will speak to, what access you have. Paragraph three is logistics — your credentials, your proposed length and format, and the one question you need answered to proceed.

Anatomy of a strong pitch email

Subject line

Specific and story-led. Not "Feature idea" but "NHS waiting lists: one patient's 900-day wait for a knee replacement — exclusive access." The editor should be able to tell from the subject line whether the story fits their section.

Paragraph 1 — The hook

Open with the most compelling fact, detail, or angle. Introduce the news peg if there is one. Why is this story urgent? Why will readers care? Who will it affect? Keep this to three to five sentences.

Paragraph 2 — The substance

What do you know? What interviews have you already secured or can credibly arrange? What documents, data, or access do you have? This is where editors decide whether you can actually deliver the story. Keep it factual; do not oversell.

Paragraph 3 — Logistics + credentials

Proposed length, section, and format. Your relevant credits (brief — one or two publications). State whether this is an exclusive and for how long. Ask the one practical question you need answered (is there commissioning budget? What is their preferred length?).

When pitch craft matters most

  • 1You are approaching a national title for the first time — a badly structured pitch to a commissioning editor at a national may permanently close that door.
  • 2You are pitching a time-sensitive story with a news peg — the pitch needs to arrive fast, be clear, and include a deadline for a decision.
  • 3You have exclusive access to a source or document — the pitch must make the exclusivity case clearly without revealing enough to make the commission unnecessary.
  • 4You are multi-pitching and need to manage exclusivity honestly — stating your timeline upfront protects the relationship regardless of the outcome.
  • 5You are returning to an editor who rejected a previous pitch — the follow-up pitch needs to show you absorbed the feedback.
  • 6You are pitching a long-read or investigation — these require more substance in paragraph two; an editor commissioning a 5,000-word piece needs to see that you have the material.

Red flags that get pitches rejected

  • The subject line is generic: "Feature idea for your publication" or "Freelance pitch."
  • The pitch does not explain why this story suits this specific publication and its readers.
  • The pitch is over 400 words — it shows the journalist cannot edit themselves.
  • The pitch leads with "I am a freelance journalist with X years of experience" instead of the story.
  • No news peg or sense of urgency — why should this run now rather than any other time?
  • Attaching a full article rather than pitching the idea — send clips only if asked.
  • Mass-mailing multiple editors in the same CC or BCC field — signals no research and damages relationships with all of them.
  • Following up within 24 hours of sending the pitch — it signals impatience and ignores how busy editorial teams are.

Pre-send pitch checklist

  • I have read the target publication and can name which section this story belongs in.
  • I have found the specific commissioning editor for that section (not a general editorial address if avoidable).
  • My subject line contains the story angle, not just a category label.
  • My first paragraph leads with the story hook, not with my credentials.
  • I have explained the news peg or why now is the right time to run this.
  • I have specified the proposed length, format, and section in the third paragraph.
  • I have included one or two relevant recent clips (linked, not attached as files).
  • I have stated clearly whether this is an exclusive offer and if so, for how long.
  • The pitch is 150–300 words and reads cleanly without jargon.
  • I have spell-checked and read the pitch aloud to check the rhythm.
  • I have a follow-up date set in my pitch tracker (five to seven working days from send).

Generate a pitch email

The Advanced Pitch Generator walks you through 16 fields including pitch type, urgency, exclusivity, sources, and rights — producing a professional pitch email you can adapt and send.

Common pitching mistakes

  • Pitching the same story you already pitched somewhere else without disclosing that — editors talk.
  • Failing to research the publication and pitching a story they ran three months ago.
  • Using the same pitch template for every outlet — tailoring takes five minutes and dramatically improves conversion.
  • Waiting until a story is fully written before pitching — commission first, write second.
  • Not following up at all after a pitch — a polite one-time follow-up is professional and often gets a response.
  • Taking a rejection personally and not engaging with what the editor said — feedback in a rejection is valuable.
  • Pitching the wrong editor — a news editor does not commission long reads; a features editor does not commission breaking news.
  • Including attachments in a first-pitch email — this triggers spam filters and is not standard practice. Link to clips instead.

Related guides

Primary sources

Frequently asked questions

How long should a pitch email be?
Three paragraphs, 150–300 words maximum. Paragraph one is your hook (why this story, why now, why this publication). Paragraph two is the substance (what you know, who you will interview, what the angle is). Paragraph three is your credentials and a single practical question (availability, fee, exclusivity). Editors scan dozens of pitches a day; conciseness is a professional signal.
Is multi-pitching the same pitch to multiple editors unethical?
Multi-pitching the same exclusive idea simultaneously to multiple publications at the same level is widely considered a breach of professional etiquette. However, pitching non-exclusive ideas to multiple publications is standard practice. If you have a time-sensitive exclusive, give your target publication a clear deadline for a response (typically 48–72 hours) and state it honestly — most editors respect this. Simultaneous submission of the same exclusive pitch without disclosure is the practice that damages relationships.
When is the best time to pitch an editor?
Tuesday to Thursday, between 9.30am and 11am, is widely cited as the optimal window. Avoid Monday (inboxes are full) and Friday (editors are prepping for weekend or winding down). For news-led features, pitch as close to the news hook as possible — within 24–48 hours if the hook is a breaking story. For longer magazine features, pitch six to eight weeks before your target publication date to allow for commissioning, writing, editing, and production.
How many times should I follow up after sending a pitch?
Once, after five to seven working days if there has been no response. Keep the follow-up brief: one sentence restating the offer, one sentence noting you can adapt if the angle does not fit. After a second non-response (total two emails) you can assume the answer is no and either shelve the pitch or approach a different publication. Repeated follow-ups after two unanswered emails are professionally damaging.
What is a first-look deal and should I agree to one?
A first-look (or right of first refusal) agreement means you show a particular editor or publication all pitches in a specified area before approaching anyone else. In return, the publication typically offers a higher acceptance rate, faster decisions, or a preferred rates deal. First-look arrangements can be valuable if the relationship is strong and the terms are clear and time-limited. Avoid open-ended or exclusive arrangements that effectively lock you out of the wider market indefinitely.

Primary sources

Related guides