Last reviewed: Next review due:
The anonymity framework explained
The Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992 gives automatic, lifetime anonymity to the complainant (the alleged victim) in cases involving a wide range of sexual offences. The anonymity begins the instant an allegation is made — not when charges are brought or court proceedings begin. It covers: name, address, place of work, school, any still or moving image, and any other detail that is likely to lead members of the public who know the complainant to identify them as the complainant. Breaching the restriction is a criminal offence, punishable on summary conviction by a fine.
The relevant offences are listed in section 2 and the schedule to the 1992 Act and include rape, sexual assault, causing or inciting sexual activity, voyeurism, administering a substance to commit a sexual offence, and a range of offences under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Defendants in England and Wales have no automatic anonymity — but the growing body of case law around pre-charge privacy (led by Bloomberg v ZXC [2022] UKSC 5) means that naming uncharged suspects carries real civil law risk.
When this matters for journalists
- 1You are reporting on a rape trial and want to name the defendant — lawful, but consider jigsaw risk: does naming him, plus his relationship to the complainant, plus the location, identify her?
- 2A public figure is charged with sexual assault and the complainant is known to the public — extra care needed; even a known connection between them may enable jigsaw ID.
- 3A historical abuse investigation is announced before any arrest — there is no s.1992 Act protection until an allegation is made, but Bloomberg v ZXC pre-charge privacy applies.
- 4A complainant tells their story publicly on social media — they may have waived their anonymity, but only if written consent is in place; their disclosure does not permit yours.
- 5You are covering a case where multiple complainants are involved — each complainant has separate anonymity protection; do not assume the group can be aggregated.
- 6A Northern Ireland case involves sexual offences — additional pre-charge anonymity provisions exist in NI beyond those in England and Wales.
- 7An acquittal is returned — the complainant's anonymity does not lift; do not name them.
Red flags to watch for
- The charge is any sexual offence listed in the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992 — complainant anonymity is automatic.
- The defendant and complainant are in a close personal relationship — naming the defendant may enable identification of the complainant.
- The case involves a community where the parties are known to each other — jigsaw identification risk is highest in close-knit settings.
- You are filing copy that mentions the workplace, school, or residential area of anyone involved.
- A complainant has spoken publicly — check written waiver; verbal or social media statements may not constitute valid waiver.
- Archived previous stories contain identifying information — consider suppression or amendment.
- The suspect has not been charged — Bloomberg v ZXC pre-charge privacy applies; civil liability risk.
- You are working with photographs — even images that do not name anyone can enable identification in context.
Pre-publication checklist
- I have confirmed whether the offence charged is covered by the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992.
- My copy does not name, photograph, or describe the complainant in any way likely to identify them.
- I have considered whether the defendant's name, plus their relationship to the complainant, enables jigsaw ID.
- If the complainant has spoken publicly, I have confirmed valid written waiver is in place before relying on it.
- I have confirmed whether the suspect has been charged or is pre-charge, and considered Bloomberg v ZXC risk.
- I have checked whether historical or archived content needs amending to avoid ongoing identification risk.
- I have consulted with a legal adviser if there is any doubt about jigsaw identification risk.
- I am not relying solely on the fact that other outlets have named someone — they may be wrong or have different legal cover.
Tools for this area
Use our reporting restrictions checklist to run through sexual offence anonymity questions before you file.
Open Reporting Restrictions ChecklistCommon mistakes
- Thinking anonymity only kicks in once there's a charge — it starts from the moment of allegation.
- Publishing a complainant's social media posts or photos even without naming them — images can identify.
- Treating a verbal "I want my name out there" from a complainant as valid waiver — written consent is required.
- Assuming the anonymity lifts after an acquittal — it does not.
- Publishing the defendant's name without checking whether, given the nature of the relationship, this enables identification of the complainant.
- Failing to consider Northern Ireland law differences when covering cross-border cases.
- Believing that because the police named a suspect, publication is safe — police naming does not waive any court anonymity or pre-charge privacy rights.
- Not updating or suppressing old archived articles that contain identifying information.
Related guides
Reporting Restrictions Overview
All major UK court reporting restrictions in one guide.
Privacy & Misuse of Private Information
Article 8, pre-charge privacy, and Bloomberg v ZXC.
Contempt of Court
Active proceedings and what you can safely publish.
Defamation Risk Checklist
Serious harm, truth, and public interest defences.
Primary sources
Frequently asked questions
When does the anonymity for a sexual offence complainant begin?
The lifetime anonymity under the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992 begins from the moment an allegation is made. It does not require an arrest, charge, or court proceeding. The moment a complaint is made to police — or even publicly — the prohibition on identifying the complainant applies. The protection lasts for the complainant's lifetime.
Can a complainant waive their anonymity?
Yes, but only in a specific way. A complainant aged 16 or over may give written consent to waive their anonymity. The consent must be given in writing and the complainant must not have been pressured into doing so. A court can also make an order permitting identification if satisfied the restriction would impose an unreasonable restraint on reporting — a very high bar. Verbal consent is not sufficient.
Does the anonymity apply after a defendant is acquitted?
Yes. The complainant's anonymity survives an acquittal. Even if the jury returns a not guilty verdict, the complainant retains their lifetime right not to be identified. Publishing the complainant's identity after an acquittal is still a criminal offence under the 1992 Act.
What is jigsaw identification and how does it arise in sexual offence cases?
Jigsaw identification is where multiple pieces of individually permissible information — the defendant's name, the relationship between defendant and complainant, the location, the workplace, the timeframe — can be assembled by readers to identify the complainant without naming them. Courts have convicted journalists and editors for jigsaw identification. Before publishing any detail, ask: could a reader who knows the complainant identify them from this combination of facts?
What is the legal position on naming suspects before charge?
There is no statutory anonymity for suspects before charge in England and Wales (unlike Northern Ireland, which has additional provisions). However, Bloomberg v ZXC [2022] UKSC 5 established that individuals under criminal investigation have a reasonable expectation of privacy in that fact, particularly before charge. Publishing the name of an uncharged suspect risks a misuse of private information claim. This is distinct from — and applies on top of — sexual offence complainant anonymity.